A large number of literate westerners spend most of their waking hours at computers, and those computers are connected to the web. The characteristic activity on such a computer has been given the pleasing name "wilfing", adapted from the acronym WWILF, or "What was I looking for?" You work a bit. You check if it's your move in Facebook Scrabble. You get an email. You answer it. You get a text. You answer it. Since your phone's in your hand, you play Angry Birds for five minutes. You work a bit. You go online to check something, get distracted by a link, forget what you were looking for, stumble on a picture of a duck that looks like Hitler, share it on Twitter, rinse and repeat.
-from Guardian article hereeta: Oh,
this comment is wonderful. It's why I don't own a Kindle yet, and why buying one isn't even close to the top of my list. It's why I buy books even when I have ten or twenty sitting as-yet unopened on my shelf. It's why I read. It's why I own copies of books that are selling for £20 or £60 or £100+ on Amazon, but I won't sell them because they're
my books.
Wonderful. I'd love to buy that person a coffee. Or better yet, a book token.
no subject
Date: 2011-08-14 10:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-08-14 10:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-08-14 10:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-08-14 11:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2011-08-15 02:44 am (UTC)As an ereader owner, I can say it's totally convenient, especially when traveling/commuting. And if you've got space limitations, it can be great instead of having to store physical books. But I've also never spent a dime on an ebook that had DRM, don't plan on ever doing so, and I read way more print books than electronic ones. (Honestly, I got the ereader for work reasons, probably wouldn't have bothered otherwise.)
no subject
Date: 2011-08-15 06:53 pm (UTC)I suspect if I'd known that my job-with-a-long-commute was going to last a year, I would've bought a Kindle last year to fill all that journey time but it was always "just one more month" and it never seemed worth it. I'd definitely get one if I go backpacking again; it would've been brilliant,so I totally get why they can be useful. But now, without a proper justification to splash out on one, £150 just seems like money that'll buy me an awful lot of paperbacks. ;D
no subject
Date: 2011-08-15 07:07 pm (UTC)Idk; I do totally see why they're useful and a good thing to have on hand but...like I said above, £152 will buy me a lot of paperbacks which I can lend to friends and my mother. Een with a Kindle I'd still need to collect books because I love signed books, I'm halfway through series that I'd want to complete etc.. I guess I'm mostly not willing to exchange £150 worth of books for something to read them on when I'm not convinced I'd use it.
And even if I do get a Kindle (which I probably will at some point) I think I'll always like the tactile sensation of reading a print book too much to give it up. ^_^
(I love your icon. ^_^ It's very, very true.)