A thought.
Jun. 27th, 2005 04:53 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
clo_againHow Andy Roddick plays tennis - good or bad for tennis as a whole? The commentators are saying that some people aren't big fans, citing the not exactly fascinating final against fellow big server Karlovic at Queens but... to me it doesn't matter how he wins - aside from cheating of course - as long as he wins. Sure it'd be nice to see Federer-esque rallies and volleys flying off his racquet every now and then but that just isn't Andy and that doesn't make his tennis any 'less worthy' than Roger's or Coria's.
Yes he relies on his serve way too much. Sometimes I'd like to sit in the audience and throw some of those giant novelty tennis balls at him with 'STRATEGY IS YOUR FRIEND' scribbled over them until he gets the hint. Maybe he'd beat Roger more often if he had a game plan. Right now he's flattening poor Coria, so I don't much care.
There are three people dressed as wombles sitting in the audience. Am very amused. *giggles* Though I have to wonder how they got the costumes past security.
Clo
Yes he relies on his serve way too much. Sometimes I'd like to sit in the audience and throw some of those giant novelty tennis balls at him with 'STRATEGY IS YOUR FRIEND' scribbled over them until he gets the hint. Maybe he'd beat Roger more often if he had a game plan. Right now he's flattening poor Coria, so I don't much care.
There are three people dressed as wombles sitting in the audience. Am very amused. *giggles* Though I have to wonder how they got the costumes past security.
Clo
